Difference between revisions of "202MF Tri-Angle Sharpmaker"
From Spydiewiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (New page: ==History, mentionings from the forums etc.== Some information from Sal Glesser posted on the BladeForums: ''The 201 was narrow, no flairs at the bottom, 40 degrees angle only, 2 bra...) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
''The 201 was narrow, no flairs at the bottom, 40 degrees angle only, 2 brass safety guards. We realized early on that it was too narrow and added flanges on the front half for greater support which was the 202.''<ref>The entire thread containing Mr. Glesser's comment can be found [http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1249923-The-first-Sharpmaker?p=14311263#post14311263| here].</ref> | ''The 201 was narrow, no flairs at the bottom, 40 degrees angle only, 2 brass safety guards. We realized early on that it was too narrow and added flanges on the front half for greater support which was the 202.''<ref>The entire thread containing Mr. Glesser's comment can be found [http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1249923-The-first-Sharpmaker?p=14311263#post14311263| here].</ref> | ||
== References == | |||
<references/> | |||
Revision as of 18:47, 6 January 2015
History, mentionings from the forums etc.
Some information from Sal Glesser posted on the BladeForums:
The 201 was narrow, no flairs at the bottom, 40 degrees angle only, 2 brass safety guards. We realized early on that it was too narrow and added flanges on the front half for greater support which was the 202.[1]
