Difference between revisions of "201MF Tri-Angle Sharpmaker"

From Spydiewiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==History, mentionings from the forums etc.== Some information from Sal Glesser posted on the Spyderco forums: ''The 201 was narrow, no flairs at the bottom, 40 degrees angle only, 2...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==History, mentionings from the forums etc.==
==History, mentionings from the forums etc.==
Some information from [[Sal Glesser]] posted on the Spyderco forums:  
Some information from [[Sal Glesser]] posted on the BladeForums:  


''The 201 was narrow, no flairs at the bottom, 40 degrees angle only, 2 brass safety guatrds. We realized early on that it was too narrow and added flanges on the front half for greater supprt which was the 202.''<ref>The entire thread containing Mr. Glesser's comment can be found [http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1249923-The-first-Sharpmaker?p=14311263#post14311263| here].</ref>
''The 201 was narrow, no flairs at the bottom, 40 degrees angle only, 2 brass safety guards. We realized early on that it was too narrow and added flanges on the front half for greater support which was the 202.''<ref>The entire thread containing Mr. Glesser's comment can be found [http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1249923-The-first-Sharpmaker?p=14311263#post14311263| here].</ref>

Revision as of 18:43, 6 January 2015

History, mentionings from the forums etc.

Some information from Sal Glesser posted on the BladeForums:

The 201 was narrow, no flairs at the bottom, 40 degrees angle only, 2 brass safety guards. We realized early on that it was too narrow and added flanges on the front half for greater support which was the 202.[1]

  1. The entire thread containing Mr. Glesser's comment can be found here.